The 429sl turned me on to riding short travel 29ers. Despite the steep headtube angle and racy accoutrement, this thing answered the questions I was trying to ask all along. The quickness, smoothness and precision of this bike made riding the undulating single track around here as fun as pointing a much bigger bike downhill outright. So I was hooked. The 429 trail came along shortly thereafter and further perfected this format. Due to availability and budget not coinciding, I bought several bikes that I felt emulated the 429trail. They sufficed as my go-to bikes to certain extents but certainly fell short of any of Pivots offerings at the time.
With the release of the 5.5 we witnessed another notable shift in Pivots designs. The lines got straighter and the tubes assumed a more square shape. Pivots logo/name was only seen a few places on the bike rather than 10+. I remember looking at the 5.5 thinking "man I wish they would make a 29er that looked this good". Someone heard me. The Trail 429 was the answer to all my hopes. First glance was promising and all the on-paper details aligned beautifully. The spec very closely mirrored what we see across Pivots lineup and the price schedule showed no departure from their usual rudiment.
I got a relatively early chance to demo at Dirt Fest in WVA and was blown away by the bikes performance and in-person appearance. With the first impression checklist having gone so swimmingly, I was allowed to fully delve into what made this bike so awesome.
If you are at all sticking to namesake of the former 429 Trail to make any assumptions, I could only agree that this informs the awesomeness of Pivots overall lineup and bears only vague similarity in ride characteristic- lets have a look at stats. The Trail 429 as it compares to the 429 Trail has been treated with a steeper seat tube angle, slacker head tube angle, slightly taller BB, shorter chainstays and subsequently longer wheelbase as well as a bump to 120mm of travel in the rear. The Trail also features a rear axle spacing now seen on two of their other models- SuperBoostPlus (157x12) which Pivot outlines with great confidence the benefit and defense of this new spacing. As mentioned before, we see tube shape and over all bike look set itself further apart from its predecessor. Internal cable routing and sharper corners will be an obvious standout with the new Trail. As far as performance, we will see a lot of familiarity get tremendously expounded upon from the 429 of yore.
I recently took delivery of a Trail429 XT/XTR Pro build as my personal bike, I opted for the DPX2 upgrade as well as the Reynolds Carbon/ I9 wheel set. Out of the box, the DPX 2 and Fox 34 were setup per Pivots Suspension Setup Guide, along with their intuitive sag gauge- setup was fairly simple and provided a decent, familiar ride quality almost immediately. The short rear end provides the rider with a noticeable snappiness and the longer front end keeps things rounded and stable. The bike seems naturally "acquainted" with every type of terrain on which its ridden and its eagerness to bound up punchy climbs and negotiate tight maneuvers- up or down, makes it extremely rewarding to leave the hammer down at all times. Having previously tested the bike sans carbon wheels reinforced that while carbon is not requisite- it certainly sweetens, lightens and stiffens the deal.. This is a tough sell though- the DT Swiss alloy wheel setup that typically ships with the bike is hard to beat. As mentioned before, this bike rewards hammer-down style riding as it responds exquisitely to hard pedal inputs and affirmative line choices. I find myself riding much more aggressively as a result.
As ride time mounted, I began to delve into a more pinpointed setup. At 230lbs I found the fork to be a little dive-y and the rebound of the rear shock to be slightly incongruent with my riding style. After spending some time under the thinking cap, I decided that a larger air volume spacer in the rear shock would not only give me a plusher beginning-of-stroke and better progressivity but also effectively cause the linear tuned shim stack to speed up flow at the beginning of the return stroke while maintaining the slower rebound that Pivot likes under regular trail input- this gave me the "pop" I was looking for while preserving a planted, collected feel through the rough stuff- the compression setting suggestions that Pivot offers cannot be understated here, with sag gauge minded and setting suggestions heeded, my rear shock was dialed. As for the fork- I added 1 spacer, followed the chart on the actual fork leg and wound the compression in just a few clicks further than suggested. The bike now pedals and handles spectacularly all while being extremely plush and compliant in the chunder.
Overall, this bike is an extremely strong contender for best I've ever owned or ridden. Versatility, form and overall performance make a strong case for consideration for YOUR next bike as well.